When reading a passage in the Bible What person is there who can set aside What he wants it to mean Or expects it to mean Or thought it meant yesterday Or has always heard that it means Or what his friends want it to mean?
Who is there among us Who is truly free Simply to listen And consider?
It can take quite some time to learn how to work the Bible puzzle—and for many of us, one of the first steps seems to be coming to the realization that it is, indeed, a puzzle at all! I remember taking offense when I heard a certain author call it that sometime in the early 2000s. My view of it at the time went something like this:
We’ve been “given everything we need” in the Bible, so it’s all in there.
If we were just faithful and diligent, it would all make perfect sense. It’s very “clear”.
The Spirit helps us understand it, so what’s to puzzle over? (The way I understand it, therefore, must be pretty close to being right.)
This is such a tough principle to navigate! How much should we “stand our ground”, and how much should we simply let people be the people they are, even if it steps on our toes?
I think this is one of the greatest philosophical questions we face as humans, and how we face it says a great deal about what kind of people we are. (And I don’t think I understand it all myself—just that it’s of huge importance.)
How curious that a man Can be willing to do a thing And yet not be willing to be it— That he will commit to it outwardly And even for impressive periods of time And yet not love it with all his inner being— And live on for years divided about it in his spirit!
We will take the empty young man Who knows nothing and has no wisdom And we will fill him up To bursting with pompousness With the vacuous ideas That since we have put him up front That must mean that he is Knowledgeable and wise after all And that God himself has ordained it.
In a way, the human will seems to underlie so many of our cognitive processes—and even so, it is not always unified within itself.
I’m going to do my best to keep this short, as I just want to put a couple of thoughts out there without composing the volumes of supporting ideas that should eventually go with it. So here’s my main point: I think that in our complicated selves—somewhere amid that thing—or groups of things—that we sometimes refer to with words such as mind, heart, soul, spirit, or being, there’s an important part that underlies the parts of which we are more often aware. The parts we more commonly “see” in action—that we are more routinely aware of—have to do with mental functions or features like thoughts, words, actions, feelings, plans, decisions, and actions. Though probably none of us are fully aware of all of these things when they happen, most of us are at least generally aware that such things are indeed doing on inside our selves. That underlying part is what I will (today) call “the will”; it’s our set of desires (wants, wishes, inclinations)—and the important feature of it that I’d like to draw attention to in this post is that not all of the desires that reside there are pointing in the same direction; sometimes they are at odds with one another. And when this happens, it can sometimes make us miserable. I’ve lately taken to describing this misery by use of the metaphor of a horse having a burr under its saddle.
My church may not be perfect— It may have its shortcomings and flaws— It may have its errors and bad habits And its imperfect leaders— And even some of its sins Swept under the carpet—