“Called by the Universe”: Neil DeGrasse Tyson

A couple of months ago, I decided I’d keep track along the way of individuals in our generation who claim to be prophets.  I happened upon a surprising claim this week from an Astrophysicist, Neil DeGrasse Tyson.  While he did not claim to be a prophet of God in the fashion that many religious people do, I was intrigued that he claims to have been “called by the Universe”.

Here is the excerpt you will find in the embedded YouTube video at roughly 00:00:45 – 00:01:17:

“I wanted to become an astrophysicist not because I chose it; in a way, the Universe chose me.  …. I was called by the Universe.  I had no choice in the matter.”  (See it in the video below.)

I find this interesting because the scientist is most likely waxing metaphoric, as if to say that “It was as if the Universe were calling to me.”  If this is how humans tend to think about their own experiences—even those we might assume to be highly-trained thinkers such as Tyson—then is it any wonder that average citizens tend to wax imaginary about their “callings” from God?  Is it any wonder that so very many people fancy themselves to have a “relationship with God” even though they know full well that there is nothing typical about that “relationship”?  That is, they talk to God but God doesn’t talk back.  They ask for things and often don’t get anything that can even be imagined to be a response from God.  They cannot make a phone call to reach him as they do with their other relationships, and he doesn’t reply to email.  Yet even so, they imagine a “relationship” with him just the same.  And here we have the famous Astrophysicist engaging in something of the same general sort, it seems.

How interesting.  Yet he does it in the name of “science”, as he looks down on those who do it in the name of “religion”.

If the Universe can call an astrophysicist and a table can give Wayne Dyer the words for a book, perhaps the preachers claiming prophecy ought at least to be recognized as belonging to a larger group of humans doing the same general thing—-however unreal those claims may be.

I, for one, would prefer that we all be honest and rational, not making any claim that we cannot demonstrate as true.

 

Posted in Prophecy | Leave a comment

Six Sayings That Are Likely Indicators of Personal Inauthenicity

I’ve learned through experience that people who say the following are not likely to be highly-authentic people.

  1. “To be honest…” or “To tell the truth…”  Whenever I hear this, I always wonder why it is at that particular point in the conversation that this phrase comes out.  Was the person lying before this point in the conversation?   And if not, why is it important to affirm to me that he is not lying now?  Has he suddenly become untrustworthy in the middle of a conversation?  And if not to me, why to himself?  Or is he just a cognitive miser who repeats this phrase because he has heard it from others, and without regard to whatever it is supposed to mean or what it might tend to convey (or to betray, even)?  None of these possibilities speak well of his personal authenticity. Continue reading
Posted in Character | Leave a comment

Pelham’s Rules for Belief

  1. The primary goals of belief should be the pursuit of and participation in reality.
  2. Always remember that reality is neither dependent upon nor created by beliefs.  No amount of believing can make any untrue thing true.
  3. Belief in things for which solid proof is not available should always be held as Continue reading
Posted in Pelham's Laws | Leave a comment

Pelham’s Rules of Honesty

#1.  It is an error to assume that he who is honest in one thing is honest in any or all other things.

#2.  It is an error to assume that he who is dishonest in one thing is dishonest in any or all other things.

#3.  It is an error to assume that he who is honest about a thing is telling the whole truth about it.

#4.  It is an error to assume either that he who is telling the truth has no dishonorable intentions in telling it, or that he must have dishonorable intentions.

#5.  Oftentimes, deception is not shrouded in an initial assertion of fact, but either in the proposed application of that fact or in false assertions that follow.

#6.  Even when the truth is spoken, deception is as apt to begin in the mind (or biases) of the hearer as in the mouth of the speaker.

#7.  An assertion is no more likely to be true simply because I wish it to be true.

#8.  No assertion should be uttered or repeated until it has been verified.

#9.  No assertion should be taken as true until it has been verified.

#10.  In a dishonest society, one should expect honest behavior to be divisive.

#11.  In a dishonest society, one should expect honest behavior to be costly.

 

 

 

Posted in Paradigms, Pelham's Laws | Leave a comment

Claim to Prophecy: Wayne Dyer

Popular motivational speaker Wayne Dyer (Wikipedia article) claims that he is not the source of his own writing and speaking.  You may watch the full length presentation, in which I found the following clip at Youtube.   The excerpt below occurs from 1:55 to 3:29 on the full video.

“…I finally realized that I don’t write the books—that there is an energy that is working through me, whether you call it Source or God or Spirit…  ”

He goes on to describe how words once flowed from a table into his hand upon the table, and from there, through his heart and over to his writing hand, where he wrote them into the book he was composing at the time.

Continue reading

Posted in Prophecy | Leave a comment

Pelham’s Law of the Tyranny of the Masses

Pelham’s Law of the Tyranny of the Masses:  The citizens become collectively complicit in tyranny when they allow it to flourish.

Corollary 1:  Neither ignorance, fear, distraction, nor apathy excuse the citizens from purging tyranny.  Nor does participation in failing solutions and/or organizations excuse the citizen. Continue reading

Posted in Pelham's Laws, Politics | Leave a comment

Pelham’s Law of Governmental Control

Pelham’s Law of Governmental Control:  Governments are controlled by those who drive the hardest and are hardest to deter.

Corollary 1:  Those who control a government are unlikely to give it up voluntarily. Continue reading

Posted in Pelham's Laws, Politics | Leave a comment

Pelham’s Second Law of Political Solutions

Pelham’s Second Law of Political Solutions:  In a society of cognitive misers, government’s interest in solving problems increases in direct proportion to the amount of personal benefit the governors expect to gain from the proposed solution.

 

 

 

Posted in Pelham's Laws, Politics | Leave a comment

Pelham’s First Law of Political Solutions

Pelham’s Law of Political Solutions:  In a society of cognitive misers, the more popular a political solution is, the less likely it is to be effective for its stated purpose.

 

Posted in Pelham's Laws, Politics | Leave a comment

“What do you suggest (to save America)?”

A Facebook friend invited me to like the Facebook page of the Republican Liberty Caucus.  I took the time to send a considered reply (below), to which she responded by asking what I think should be done.  Here is that conversation:

My Response to the invitation: Continue reading

Posted in Character, Politics, Religion | Leave a comment