Your amazing self can notice a thing in this world and:
- be interested/curious about it.
- examine it.
- study it.
- wonder about it.
- develop hypotheses about it.
- test those hypotheses.
- compare it with known facts.
- reflect on it.
- discuss it with others.
- draw some tentative conclusions about it.
- test those conclusions against fact and logic, keeping some and rejecting others.
- stay on the lookout for new information on the topic, just in case you’ve misunderstood .
- embrace/believe the conclusions that seem worthy.
- make moral/philosophical judgments about the matter (if it is that sort of matter).
- overturn previous beliefs based on the new information.
- develop emotional associations with the subject.
- teach your conclusions to others, guiding them through all these steps.
Meanwhile, your same amazing self can also:
- decide on the value of the thing, good or bad, without doing any of the due diligence items on the first list above.
- default to assumptions/hearsay/traditions/consensus about the thing, neglecting your own investigation.
- mistake the thing for something else.
- think you already understand the thing well when you do not.
- not notice the thing.
- be distracted from the thing.
- find the thing unimportant, as it regards your priorities.
- let yourself off the hook by saying you’ll have to examine it later.
- find the thing unimportant, as examination of things does not fit with your current mood.
- reject or accept the thing summarily because of preexisting emotional associations with the thing itself.
- reject or accept the thing summarily because of preexisting emotional associations with certain people or institutions who are related with the thing.
- reject or accept the thing summarily because it is old.
- reject or accept the thing summarily because it is new.
- look for other excuses for summarily deciding about the thing.
- make a show (to yourself or to others) of examining the thing, when you’ve actually decided on its value already.
- lie/exaggerate to yourself about the thing.
- lie/exaggerate to others about the thing.
- teach your conclusions to others, but without revealing the steps you took to reach those conclusions.
The same mind can treat one matter with high honesty, rationality, and responsibility, and another quite differently! It’s somewhat like the way we might treat the various people who come to our houses or call us on the phone—some being welcome (and for different reasons), and some being not welcome at all.
But have you ever assumed the worst about a visitor or caller, only to discover later that they had value to you after all? That’s the amazing thing about us that I wanted to point out in this post. We can really get some things right, but we are amazingly capable of misjudging things, too. And it seems to be quite up to us—how careful we are with how we judge things.
The more I think about it, the more impressed I am with how much power we were given over our own lives. And it’s quite analogous to the power of the automobile, which we’d much rather see in the hands of a mature, kind, sober and responsible person than in the hands of someone else!
So much of the outcome seems to be based on the quality of the judgments we make about things!